Emotions for engineers


Emotions (for Engineers)


I know this is not typical, but I’d like to share with you an intensely useful metaphor that I absolutely hate. Hating it is especially difficult for me, because I made it up. It’s just not….me. But it’s wildly effective with some clients – especially the analytical, emotionally restricted, very controlled clients.

Let’s start with this: there are 6 basic human emotions. (I know, some researchers say 5, 7, or 9. Some are currently working on disputes. Of course, there are cultural, familial, and other influences. Maybe that’s a topic for another day, along with the relative absence of really good emotion lists or wheels. Today, we speak of Paul Ekman, the father of universal emotion research.)

FEAR, SADNESS, ANGER, DISGUST, JOY, INTEREST

And while I most want to write about the varieties of emotional experiencing, primary vs. secondary emotions, emotion constellations, and more, instead I’m going to tell you how I sometimes talk to people about emotions who aren’t as “into” emotions as I am. This may be because they’re truly alexithymic, because they were raised in a traditional male gender role or any of a number of cultural systems that value emotional restriction, or because they’re Vulcan. Here goes:

Think of emotions as an internal indicator about the allocation of resources in your environment. Resources could be anything – money, time, relationships, etc.

FEAR – Fear is an emotion that tells us a resource is in danger. The importance of the resource and the level of perceived danger (in intensity, closeness, and ability to deal with it) will determine whether we feel nervous (like when the resource of social status might be threatened by potentially having poor public speaking performance next week) or terrified (the resource of life/health is threatened by an oncoming 18-wheeler).

SADNESS – Sadness is the feeling we have when a resource has been lost. Again, the level of sadness we feel is determined by a few moderators like the importance of the resource (like a close family member), the irretrievability/irreplaceability (like death as opposed to a job loss), and the “realness” (e.g., we feel disappointment when we perceive a loss of something we didn’t actually have yet).

ANGER – We experience anger when resources are perceived to have been distributed unfairly. When we don’t get something that we believe that we deserve, we feel anger in response. It’s something that we can feel this as a response to someone else being unfairly resourced – an abused child being denied safety and love, the environment being destroyed through improper resource management, our kid not winning the science fair even though their project was definitely better than those other kids’.

(note: people often experience anger or something like anger as a “secondary” or “substitute” emotion when they have learned that other emotions are too painful or not acceptable to express, typically fear and/or sadness. More on this in another post, sometime.)

DISGUST – Disgust occurs when a resource is potentially threatened with corrosion or infection. This can be a physiological kind of disgust, like when we are exposed to an obviously ill person or a rotted food. It can also be when we believe our character/environment might be threatened with moral decay or infection by the presence of contemptible others.

JOY – Joy happens when we believe our resources (again, this includes all kinds of resources – money, love, status, purpose, etc.) are sufficient and safe. If we have just enough and aren’t worried, we feel contentment. We may even feel a burst of happiness or delight when we receive an unexpected resource – a winning lotto ticket or spontaneous hug. (You might prefer to use the word “happiness” for this emotion in general because you believe “joy” is tied up with purpose and meaning. Great; I support that!)

INTEREST – Interest, like all of the emotions, comes in different intensities. For example, curiosity, wonder, and awe are emotions we feel when we recognize that a resource is salient. It often combines with other emotions to tell us how salient a resource is in what way. It acts as a modifier (e.g., telling us whether something is a bit scary, pretty scary, or very scary).

 

It’s a work in progress, so comments below, especially if you have questions or ideas!

 

 

 

 

Easier to believe what we fear


It’s easier to believe what we’re afraid of…


It’s easier to believe what we’re afraid of, than what we hope for. (Almost always, for almost everyone.)

I can’t tell you how much it changed my practice when I realized this phenomenon, and began explaining it to clients. Here are two ways to think about it.

 

  • Let me tell you a story about evolution. (Just a story, mind you. This isn’t the time to get bogged down in phyla and epigenetics and all that.) Long ago, there were two kinds of people. One group of people saw a coiled vine and assumed it was a coiled vine. They were promptly bitten by a sneaky snake and all died. Thus, they have no living descendants. The other group of people saw a coiled vine and jumped away, thinking it was a snake. They did a lot of unnecessary jumping, a little necessary jumping, and a lot of staying alive and going on to make babies. They are our great-great-grand-cestors. So, we’re all evolved to be a little jumpy (get it? “jumpy”? haha!).
  • If you don’t like to think about it think way, you can also think about it from a very pre-frontal cortex, literature informed stance. Humans tend to be risk averse – a loss of $5 is more distressing to us than a gain of $5 is joy-inducing. In any given situation, we’re likely to put more emphasis on what we could lose than what we might gain. Fear and aversion conditioning (under most circumstances) also happen faster than other kinds of associative learning. So, if you mistake a snake for a coiled vine once and have a near miss – you’re quick to avoid vines in the future. (But you don’t so quickly change your approach to potential snakes when just one turns out to be a vine – thank goodness!) So, it’s easier to believe what we’re afraid of than what we hope for.

 

Let me just give you a few examples of application:

I know you’re already thinking of your classic GAD catastrophizer. Good, that’s #1.  Also, this leads to exacerbated social anxiety, as clients overestimate the likelihood of negative judgment. It contributes to the ever-building cause-effect sequences in OCD, because clients misjudge the likelihood that events are related. Phobia maintenance, misinterpretation of panic symptoms, etc.

And it’s not limited to anxious clients. This is the dad who can’t listen to his teenager’s needs because of his fear for her safety. It’s the workaholic (whose husband is in therapy because she can’t squeeze it in) who doesn’t realize she has a dual income family. It’s part of what maintains the hopelessness of your depressed client, the migraines of your “under-adequate”-mom client, and even the frantic relational grabbiness of your client with BPD.

Also true in your couples – when one partner is afraid of being cheated on again – he wants to hope it won’t happen again, but it’s much easier to be afraid that it will. When sex is painful, she wants to hope that it won’t be next time, but she’s afraid it will be. That’s easier to believe, and that leads to tension, and that leads to more pain. When he has an erectile “failure,” it’s harder to hope it won’t happen than to be afraid it will, and that leads to performance anxiety, and that leads to more “failure.”

It’s the beginning of so many self-fulfilling (self-defeating!) prophecies. And while we can’t change the fundamental neurology (and maybe don’t want to), bringing our own and clients’ awareness to this little quirk of our brains can help us all to pause, and bring a little more prefrontal cortex to our otherwise limbic reasoning. Here are a few specific things that can help:

 

  • Accept their fears with gentleness, and help them to extend self compassion
  • Work on reducing the actual and/or perceived consequences of the feared event
  • Co-create strategies to gain information that will help client evaluate potentially fearful situations
  • Teach this phenomenon to help clients reduce their emotional reasoning

 

Comment below with examples of how you’ve seen this in action with your clients!